| INJECTOR-PRODUCER CHANNELING IN NATURALLY
FRACTURED RESERVOIRS (PROBLEM 10 IN TABLE 1) |
| |
 |
| |
| Some of the most successful gel treatments were applied to
reduce water and gas channeling in naturally fractured reservoirs.11,55-58,68,70 The primary objective of these gel treatments was to improve sweep efficiency
and to promote incremental oil production. A secondary benefit of the gel
treatments was the substantial reduction of excessive water and gas production
at the offsetting production wells. During these injection well applications,
the time required to inject large volumes (e.g., 10,000 to 37,000 bbls)
of gel was typically greater than the gelation time by a factor around
100.11,57,58 Thus, formed gels extruded through fractures during most of
the placement process. Several operators reported that oil recovery increased
with increased volume of gel injected per treatment.11,57,58 However, sizing
of these treatments to date has been empirical—dictated primarily
by perceived economic and operational limitations. Engineering-based sizing
methods are under development for this type of problem.63 |
| |
| Theoretical work indicates that gel treatments have the greatest
potential when the conductivities of fractures that are aligned with direct
flow between an injector-producer pair are at least 10 times the conductivity
of off-trend fractures.63 Gel treatments also have their greatest potential
in reservoirs with moderate to large fracture spacing. Produced tracer
concentrations from interwell tracer studies can help identify reservoirs
that are good candidates for water shutoff using gel treatments. The average
width of the most direct fracture between an injector-producer pair can
be estimated from the breakthrough time from an interwell tracer study
using Eq. 4. Since the ability of a gel to extrude through a fracture depends
critically on the fracture width or conductivity,39,67,69 this knowledge
is important when selecting an appropriate gel formulation for the treatment. |
| |
| wf = 5.4 x10-5Lf [m /(tDp)]1/2 ,.............................
(4) |
| |
| Simulation studies indicate that the potential for successful
application of a gel treatment becomes greater as the peak produced tracer
concentration increases above 20% of the concentration the injected tracer
concentration.63 When produced tracer concentrations are low (i.e., less
than 1% of the injected tracer concentration), gel treatments are unlikely
to be effective. However, results from a poorly designed tracer test can
mislead one to believe that a gel treatment has little potential. For example,
if the tracer bank is too small, dispersion can reduce produced tracer
concentrations to very low values in a fracture system even though a gel
treatment has excellent potential. |
| |
| Ref. 55 discusses a field example where tracer testing was
conducted in conjunction with the application of injection-well CC/AP gel
treatments to the Tensleep sandstone formation of the Pitchfork Field in
Wyoming. |
| |
| Gel treatments to reduce injector-producer channeling in
naturally fractured reservoirs can be applied in either injection or production
wells. Well-documented field applications involving injector-producer channeling
in naturally fractured reservoirs can be found in Refs. 11, 55, 57, 58,
and 70. |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |